STATE CRIME: Foreigners Allowed to Buy-up British Assets and Make the People Suffer

ABOVE: Deregulation: Former Tory Chancellor Geoffrey Howe made it easier for foreigners to snap up British companies

Just for a moment, imagine being a tourist in search of the full British experience. Where would you start? Well, you might take a sight-seeing trip around London on a red double-decker bus.

You’d possibly visit a quintessentially British store, such as Boots the chemist, Selfridges or Harrods, before having a proper English tea at the Savoy, Fortnum & Mason or the Dorchester.

You’d almost certainly go home, via a British airport, thinking you’d seen a slice of the real Britain. But, in one sense at least, you’d be totally wrong.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2129507/Britain-sale-Uniquely-world-Britain-sold-half-companies-foreigners-And-paying-price.html#ixzz1tMrlmzhk

The “Government”‘s War on the British Army: the “British” State Forces War Hero to Live in Tent because He’s Not British Enough

Again, we must ask: how much longer is the British Army going to put up with this direct attack on it and its personnel by those with an ulterior motive who are so happy to send other people’s children [the British Army] to die for their political adventures but will not send their own?

We sane, objective, and sensible people must ask ourselves, and also the British Army, “when is duty and loyalty to the country” also “misguided paid mercenary work for an ‘elite’ who play them like pawns in the game of geo-politics and self-aggrandisement”?

It is clear that the British Army’s loyalty is not to the the criminal, corrupt, degenerate, warmongering ‘government’ -rather it is to the British nation who are –as evidenced by the charities they have set up on behalf of the British Army– the real friends and supporters of the British Army and who have consistently rejected the political adventures in Afghanistan and the to-date 409 British lives needless wasted for no gain whatsoever.

Any right-minded person would curse the Lib-Lab-Conmen and withhold their vote. 

A FORMER soldier is living in a tent in a friend’s garden — after being told he is not entitled to benefits.

John Heaps, 50, served in the Falklands, the first Gulf War, and Northern Ireland during his 16 years in the Army.

But when he returned to the UK in February after spending two years cycling around the world, he was told he had failed the Department for Work and Pensions’ Habitual Residence Test.

And without help, he has been forced to sleep in a friend’s garden in Leeds, West Yorks.

Divorced dad-of-two John said: “I have always been of the opinion that everybody is supposed to be treated as an individual but they do not listen to each individual story.

“I think it stinks, it’s beggars belief. I have travelled the world but this is my place of birth and my home.

“Essentially all that’s happened is I’ve been on holiday.

Read on:  http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4260343/War-hero-John-Heaps-living-in-tent-after-failing-benefits-test-to-prove-UK-ties.html

ARTICLE: 1917 Act Could Be Used to Strip Convicted Peers

Yesterday Guido pondered why there was no retribution for Peers who are convicted criminals and that it’s  just unpopular Knights that get shredded. Well it seems to have got the ball rolling…

Tory MP Matthew Hancock tells theFT“I don’t see why the rules for peers should be entirely different to the rules for MPs”. As Jim Pickardpoints out, legislation has already passed that, with an amendment or two, could make this happen. The 1917 Deprivation of Titles Act was used to strip Peers who supported Germany in WWI…

Read on: http://order-order.com/2012/02/02/1917-act-can-be-used-to-strip-convicted-peers/

ARTICLE: Tories use taxpayers’ money for pro-Turkey propaganda.

 

Disclaimer: this website does not support the B.N.P. or any other political party. Credit where credit’s due: this M.E.P. has aided the People by blowing the whistle; and this is the exact position and raison d’etre of this website –hence our due link to this article. 

Tories use taxpayers’ money for pro-Turkey propaganda. Nick Griffin MEP blows the whistle on the latest double-dealing from Cameron’s treacherous tax-eaters.

The Conservative-dominated European Conservatives and Reformists Group within the European Parliament has this week used part of its taxpayer-provided budget to fund an exhibition on “religious and cultural diversity in Turkey.

The display, in the heart of the EU’s huge complex in Brussels, is put on in collaboration with the Yunus Emre Institute, a well-funded Turkish body whose job is to spread Turkish cultural influence back into countries which used to be ruled by the Turkish Sultanate but which won their independence in the various wars of liberation against that medieval tyranny.

The exhibition, which is entitled Sharing the Sunlight, portrays Muslims, Christians and Jews living as equal citizens and good friends and neighbours in a picture-postcard Turkey.

Much is made of the restoration of several churches and synagogues at the expense of the Turkish state. No mention is made, however, of the continued wanton destruction of churches and monasteries in Turkish-occupied Cyprus. Since that island still has a majority Greek Christian population, the need for cultural/religious/ethnic cleansing in order to advance Islam is still there.

In Turkey, by contrast, centuries of persecution have so reduced non-Muslim communities that they are irrelevant and a few of their buildings can be restored for the tourists and in order to fool EU liberals into not noticing the steady Islamisation of the secular Turkey created by Kemal Ataturk.

Read on for extensive coverage:  http://bnp.org.uk/news/national/eyewitness-brussels

ARTICLE: Ken Livingstone’s anti-”fascist” group appoints “fascist” as vice-chair

 

One of this blog’s oldest friends, Azad Ali, has a great new post. As the Harry’s Place blog reports, Azad is the new vice-chair of Unite Against Fascism, the ostensibly anti-racist group (in fact more of a meal-ticket for the leadership of the Socialist Workers’ Party.)

Azad is the community affairs co-ordinator of the extremist Islamic Forum of Europe, which controls the East London Mosque and which isdedicated, in its own words, to changing the “very infrastructure of society, its institutions, its culture, its political order and its creed … from ignorance to Islam.” Through “hisbah” (the enforcement of Islamic law) and “jihad,” it aims to create a “global” Islamic dictatorship, the caliphate, and its “primary work” in this “is in Europebecause it is this continent, despite all the furore about its achievements, which has a moral and spiritual vacuum.”

The IFE has already made some progress towards its goal, exercisingstrong influence over Tower Hamlets Council through its close ally, the elected mayor, Lutfur Rahman. Lutfur’s council has been busily engaged in enforcing Islamic law on, for instance, local strip clubs and a gay pub. At the last election Azad and the IFE also helped to deliver extraordinary and unprecedented swings in their East London heartland for their equally close friend, Ken Livingstone (Ken had given the East London Mosque more than £1 million of City Hall money to build the IFE a new headquarters, despite the strenuous objections of his officials.)

Azad has written on his IFE blog of his “love” for Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda cleric. He used to attend talks by Al-Qaeda’s main representative in the UK, Abu Qatada. He has described al-Qaeda as a “myth” and said that the Mumbai terrorist attacks were not terrorism. On his IFE blog, he advocated the killing of British troops in Iraq (he sued a newspaper for reporting this, and lost.) Filmed by an undercover reporter for my Channel 4 Dispatches on the IFE, Azad said: “Democracy, if it means at the expense of not implementing the sharia, of course no-one agrees with that.” His response to this exposure was to threaten our undercover reporter.

It would, I think, be fair to describe Azad Ali as an Islamic fascist.

And Azad’s immediate boss, UAF’s chair, is… Ken Livingstone. In this small world, isn’t it fascinating how the same names keep cropping up?

Read on: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100140248/ken-livingstones-anti-fascist-group-appoints-fascist-as-vice-chair/

(Article) Labour MP Sian James and Her Thugs Try to Hide Causes of South Wales Suicides

ABOVE: Swansea Labour MP Sian James

Written by Mr. Brian Gerrish from the splendid UK Column

Labour MP Sian James employed an intimidating mob to try and frighten off those attending my Swansea talk on causes of suicides in young people in South Wales. Police and Swansea Local Council attempted to close the venue. Why?

On Thursday 26 Jan 2012, with Swansea Labour MP Sian James and her howling, intimidating mob outside, I  gave a presentation entitled “Are our Children Safe – An investigation of Politics and Suicide Risks”. Helped by detailed research by local South Wales residents, who are extremely concerned at suicide risks to their children, my talk investigated causes of suicides in young people in Bridgend and South Wales. At times, the audience, which included men and women, white and black, of faith and none, was visibly  shocked as I exposed over 40 suicides, political and press reaction, the hidden dangers of conflicting Neuro Linguistic Programming NLP sources affecting children and young people, dark and disturbing dance and drama concerning abuse and suicides backed by the National Theatre Wales, dark ‘creative drama’ for youngsters in Community Halls, perverted film making for 14 yr olds covering suicide backed by the Lottery, Creative Visualisation, risks to the mental health of children by early, excessive sex education, risks from Cameron’s ‘Behavioural Change Units’ and more. Topics also included rising police suicides and the complex shadowy network of funded organisations claiming to help prevent suicides, of which Oxford’s Mindfulness Centre raises many questions.

So desperate were the Local Authorities to stop the talk that Swansea Council and the police tried to bully the venue, Samlet Social club into pulling out. Bravely they did not. Ms James’ thugs did however cause sufficient alarm and distress to intimidate and stop some people from entering the building. Betraying true old Labour supporters. Ms James MP teamed up with rapid Tory student activist Zahid Raja who blogged “..Brian, a well-known proponent of fascism, [speaking] on faux-issues that underpin Islamaphobic propaganda…”

Like many political novices rabid Raja failed to check his facts and dismisses over 40 suicides as a non-issue. I have given over 200 talks to audiences of all colours, creeds, faiths and political views. In addition, both the British Constitution Group and Lawful Rebellion welcome all truthful, honest and caring people of all backgrounds. I have spoken in Birmingham Central mosque and have an invitation to speak again. I will speak to any group who asks me, and I never judge individual people by label – political, organisation or other. As my web article on  the Leveson Inquiry warns – the loss of free speech is the most dangerous attack on us all.

Forgive me Ms James and Zahid Raja, isn’t it the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem parties under Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg that have killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, and are now attacking Syria and Iran – at a cost of the lives of hundreds of British military – black, white, christian, muslim and of no faith. You are both disgusting in your hypocrisy. The usual cowardly MP, Ms James refused to explain her conduct when I called her press team. She is clearly not interested in the South Wales suicides and their causes.

But why should Ms James resort to this gutter mob politics? Because her Swansea Council, other Local Authorities and the Welsh Assembly are terrified of the scale and true nature of these suicides coming out. It is the LibLabCon’s psycho socio economic political attack which is now destroying young lives, and suicide clusters are appearing across UK and Northern Ireland. Please research Gramsci and Alinsky ideology in Labour and the LibCon politics, to see and understand the blatant psycho political attack on our families, society and Nation state.

Full article:  http://www.ukcolumn.org/blogs/labour-mp-sian-james-and-her-thugs-try-hide-causes-south-wales-suicides

“Lord” Mandleson -DISTURBING QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS INTEGRITY

ABOVE: Hard-headed businessmen (from left): Peter Munk, the Canadian founder and chairman of the world’s largest gold-producing corporation, Lord Mandelson, oligarch Oleg Deripaska and financier Nat Rothschild as they visit the Siberian smelter. 

Siberia in January is a very cold place indeed. What relief, then, for four weary travellers to be able to warm themselves in front of the furnace of an enormous smelter — all wearing hard hats bearing the corporate logo of Rusal, the world’s largest aluminium producer.

One of the men is Oleg Deripaska, the controversial Russian oligarch and boss of Rusal. He owns the gigantic Sayanogorsk plant near the tundra city of Abakan.

At his side is his youthful British friend and adviser, the Honourable Nat Rothschild. A billionaire financier in his own right.

A third member of the party is Peter Munk, the Canadian founder and chairman of the world’s largest gold-producing corporation. Mr Munk is a business partner of Deripaska and Rothschild.

And the smiling man at the centre of this high-powered group?

None other than Peter (now Lord) Mandelson, architect of the New Labour project, former close adviser to Tony Blair and Business Secretary in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet.

At the time these photographs were taken, in January 2005, Mandelson was the EU Trade Commissioner.

But for all the formal poses, hard hats, heavy industrial surroundings and tycoon entourage, Mandelson was in Siberia on a very unofficial basis…

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099639/The-Russian-oligarch-Old-Etonian-billionaire-deeply-disturbing-questions-Lord-Mandelsons-integrity.html#ixzz1mD5eH8iz

Blair must be arrested -John Pilger

Having helped destroy other nations far away, our former prime minister — “peace envoy” to the Middle East — is now free to profit from the useful contacts he made while working as a “servant of the people”.

Tony Blair must be prosecuted, not indulged like Peter Mandelson. Both have produced self-serving memoirs for which they have been paid fortunes; Blair’s, which has earned him a £4.6m advance, will appear next month.

Now consider the Proceeds of Crime Act. Blair conspired in and executed an unprovoked war of aggression against a defenceless country, of a kind the Nuremberg judges in 1946 described as the “paramount war crime”. This has caused, according to scholarly studies, the deaths of more than a million people, a figure that exceeds the Fordham University estimate of deaths in the Rwandan genocide.

In addition, four million Iraqis have been forced to flee their homes and a majority of children have descended into malnutrition and trauma. Cancer rates near the cities of Fallujah, Najaf and Basra (the latter “liberated” by the British) are now higher than those at Hiroshima. “UK forces used about 1.9 metric tonnes of depleted uranium ammunition in the Iraq war in 2003,” the Defence Secretary, Liam Fox, told parliament on 22 July. A range of toxic “anti-personnel” weapons, such as cluster bombs, was employed by British and US forces.

Such carnage was justified with lies that have been exposed repeatedly. On 29 January 2003, Blair told parliament: “We do know of links between al-Qaeda and Iraq . . .” Last month, the former head of MI5 Eliza Manningham-Buller told the Chilcot inquiry: “There is no credible intelligence to suggest that connection . . . [it was the invasion] that gave Osama Bin Laden his Iraqi jihad.” Asked to what extent the invasion exacerbated the threat to Britain from terrorism, she replied: “Substantially.”

The bombings in London on 7 July 2005 were a direct consequence of Blair’s actions.

Voracious greed

Documents released by the high court show that British citizens were allowed to be abducted and tortured under Blair. In January 2002, Jack Straw, then foreign secretary, decided that Guantanamo was the “best way” to ensure that UK nationals were “securely held”.

Instead of remorse, Blair has demonstrated a voracious and secretive greed. Since stepping down as prime minister in 2007, he has accumulated an estimated £20m, much of it as a result of the ties he developed with the Bush administration. The Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, which vets jobs taken by former ministers, was pressured not to make public Blair’s “consultancy” deals with the Kuwaiti royal family and the South Korean oil giant UI Energy Corporation. He gets an estimated £2m a year for “advising” the investment bank JPMorgan and undisclosed sums from other financial services companies. He makes millions from speeches, including reportedly £200,000 for one speech in China.

In his unpaid but expenses-rich role as “peace envoy” in the Middle East, Blair is, in effect, a voice of Israel, which has awarded him a $1m “peace prize”. In other words, his wealth has grown rapidly since he launched, with George W Bush, the bloodbath in Iraq.

His collaborators are numerous. The cabinet in March 2003 knew a great deal about the conspiracy to attack Iraq. Straw, later appointed “justice secretary”, suppressed the relevant cabinet minutes in defiance of an order by the Information Commissioner to release them. Most of those now running for the Labour Party leadership supported Blair’s epic crime, rising as one to salute his final appearance in the Commons. As foreign secretary, David Miliband sought to cover up Britain’s complicity in torture. He promoted Iran as the next “threat”.

Journalists who once fawned on Blair as “mystical” and amplified his vainglorious bids now pretend they were his critics all along. As for the media’s gulling of the public, only the Observer’s David Rose has apologised. The WikiLeaks exposés, released with a moral objective of truth with justice, have been bracing for a public force-fed on complicit, lobby journalism. Verbose celebrity historians such as Niall Ferguson, who rejoiced in Blair’s rejuvenation of “enlightened” imperialism, remain silent about the “moral truancy”, as Pankaj Mishra wrote, “of [those] paid to intelligently interpret the contemporary world”.

The fugitive

Is it wishful thinking that Blair will be collared? Just as the Cameron government understands the “threat” of a law that makes Britain a risky stopover for Israeli war criminals, Blair faces a similar risk in a number of countries and jurisdictions, at least of being apprehended and questioned. He is now Britain’s Kissinger, who plans his travel outside the US with the care of a fugitive.

Two recent events add weight to this. On 15 June, the International Criminal Court made the landmark decision to add aggression to its list of war crimes that can be prosecuted. It defines this as a “crime committed by a political or military leader which by its character, gravity and scale constituted a manifest violation of the [United Nations] Charter”. International lawyers described this as a “giant leap”. Britain is a signatory to the Rome statute that created the court and is bound by its decisions.

On 21 July, Nick Clegg, standing at the Commons despatch box, declared the invasion of Iraq illegal. For all the later “clarification” that he was speaking personally, the Deputy Prime Minister had made “a statement that the international court would be interested in”, said Philippe Sands, professor of international law at University College London.

Blair came from Britain’s upper middle classes which, having rejoiced in his unctuous ascendancy, might now reflect on the principles of right and wrong they require of their own children. The suffering of the children of Iraq will remain a spectre haunting Britain while Blair remains free to profit.

Taken from: http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2010/08/pilger-blair-iraq-britain

Blast from the Past: Are Paedophiles Running Tony Blair’s War Machine?

By Mike James at Counterpunch

A child-sex scandal that threatened to destroy Tony Blair’s government last week has been mysteriously squashed and wiped off the front pages of British newspapers. Operation Ore, the United Kingdom’s most thorough and comprehensive police investigation of crimes against children, seems to have uncovered more than is politically acceptable at the highest reaches of the British elite. In the 19th of January edition of The Sunday Herald, Neil Mackay sensationally reported that senior members of Tony Blair’s government were being investigated for paedophilia and the “enjoyment” of child-sex pornography:

“The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in British intelligence that at least one high-profile former Labour Cabinet minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has been given the politician’s name but, for legal reasons, can not identify the person.

There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur.”

The allegations are the most serious yet levelled at an administration that prides itself on the inclusion in its ranks of a high quota of controversial and flamboyant homosexual men, and whose First Lady, Cherie Blair, has come under the spotlight for her indulgence in pagan rituals that resemble Freemasonic rites. Unconfirmed information also suggests that the term “former Labour Cabinet minister” is misleading and that the investigation has identified a surprisingly large number of alleged paedophiles at the highest level of British government, including one very senior cabinet minister

The Blair government has responded by imposing a comprehensive blackout on the story, effectively removing it from the domain of public discussion. Attempts on the part of this journalist to establish why the British media has not followed up on the revelations have met with a wall of silence. Editors and journalists of The Times, The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, The Independent, The Sunday Times, The Observer, The Sunday Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The Daily Express, The Mirror, The Sun, the BBC, Independent Television News and even The Sunday Herald have refused to discuss the matter.

Read on

Profile: Sleazebuster Mr. Michael Barnbrook

Credit Where Credit’s Due

REGARDLESS of Mr. Barnbrook’s political affiliations we consider it right and proper that his sterling work against the criminal, corrupt degeneracy in Westminster -work that is in synch with that of this website- be acknowledged and supported by way of this profile. Such recognition of Mr. Barnrook’s work ought not suggest our support for his party, but it should indicate our applause and appreciation for his work thus undertaken.

[Mr. Barnbook's introduction has been abridged to remove extraneous material particular to his party. We are concerned only with his work as whistle-blower.]

I am a retired Metropolitan Police Inspector, having retired after 30 years service with a certificate for exemplary service.

I was one of the complainants against the Conservative MP, Michael Trend, when he was forced to stand down in 1992 for misappropriating nearly £100,000 of taxpayers money by abusing the additional costs allowance.

I was also the complainant in the case of the Labour MP. Clive Betts, who was suspended from the House for seven days for abusing Parliamentary rules.

I was the complainant against Derek Conway, MP, who has had the Conservative whip removed from him after having been suspended for ten days for abusing Parliamentary allowances. He will stand down at the next General Election.

I was the complainant in the case of Sir Nicholas and Lady Winterton, who will stand down at the next election after having been found guilty of abusing Parliamentary allowances.

I was also the complainant against Michael Martin, the Speaker of the House, in the airmiles fiasco.

I also reported James Purnell to HM customs and Revenue in February, 2008, for apparent abuse of the Capital Gains Tax allowance when he sold his London flat.

I was one of two complainants against Jacqui Smith for apparent abuse of her second home allowance.

I have also submitted a report to the Metropolitan Police asking them to investigate her activities.

I was the complainant against Harry Cohen, who is currently being investigated for apparent abuse of the ACA by stating his main residence is a caravan.

I have also asked the police to investigate his activities.

I have written to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner recently, asking him to investigate the activities of Elliot Morley who claimed £16,000 of taxpayers money after his mortgage had finished.

I have also written to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards today, asking him to investigate Kenneth Clarke over the payment of Council Tax on his main home.

These are just some of the complaints I have made against MPs’ over the years.

It was as a direct result of the Derek Conway affair that Parliament had a recent review of MPs allowances and introduced a number of changes.

It was also as a direct result of the Conway affair that a meeting took place between the Metropolitan Police and Parliamentary Officials, which resulted in the Eighth Committee on Standards and Privileges report of 2007/8, which sets down a protocol for dealing with MPs’ suspected of criminal behaviour.

Very few people in the public domain are aware that the
British National Party is very much involved in rooting out these corrupt MPs’ because of a media blackout. That is why we have to spread the news via the internet and I thank you for your interest.

Regards,

Mick Barnbrook,

____________________________________________________________________________________________

The British National Party’s sleazebuster Mick Barnbrook, who laid the first criminal charges which opened up the parliamentary elections expenses scandal, has taken another scalp with the news that Labour MP Eric Illsley has been formally charged over his expenses abuses.

The charges against Mr Illsley were also first laid by Mr Barnbrook, who has been the terror of the parliamentary swindlers for more than two years.

Mr Barnbrook first laid the complaint over Mr Illsley in June 2009 in a formal submission to Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, New Scotland Yard.

In his letter, Mr Barnbrook wrote that as many as fifty MPs are believed to have over claimed on council tax for their second homes.

“Mr Illsley, who is believed to be the worst offender, claimed more than £10,000 for council tax in four years although he was only charged £3,966 for his Band C property in Lambeth in South London for this period,” Mr Barnbrook wrote.

“According to the Daily Telegraph, Mr Illsley said ‘I admit I have made an over claim. I should have made my claim for council tax more reflective of the amount involved.’

“If the statement by Mr Illsley is correct, I consider that there is sufficient evidence for an investigation to be instigated into possible criminal offences by him, under Section 2 of the Fraud Act, 2006 and Section 17 of the Theft Act, 1986,” Mr Barnbrook wrote.

“As a taxpayer and senior citizen living on a low income, I also am really, really upset by the behaviour of individuals who should know better.

“Members have a duty to uphold the law and act on all occasions in accordance with the public trust placed in them.

“Holders of public office should take decisions solely in terms of the public interest. They should not do so in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their families or their friends,” he wrote.

Sir Paul’s office replied to Mr Barnbrook on 30 June 2009, confirming that the details had been passed to Detective Chief Inspector Michael Murphy, Economic and Specialist Crime Directorate.

“I am really happy that I have been able to bring yet another of these crooks to face justice,” Mr Barnbrook told BNP news.

“Mr Illsley has been charged with three counts under section 17 for false accounting. The first charge is that he dishonestly claimed expenses for council tax, service and maintenance charges, repairs and insurance charges, and utilities and communications charges for his second home in Renfrew Road, London, between May 2005 and April 2006

“The second charge makes the same allegations for the period till April 2007, and the third charge relates to the period until April 2008.

“Astonishingly, this means that Mr Illsley claimed £20,000 to which he was not allowed. This money, which is more than what many people earn in a year, came directly from the taxpayer,” he said.

More information of Mr. Branbrook’s work in bringing to light the crime, corruption, and degeneracy prevalent in Westminster can be found here: http://www.general-election-2010.co.uk/uk-party-political-news/bnp-sleazebuster-mick-barnbrook-ties-up-labour’s-“famous-five”-as-“baroness”-uddin-ducks-charges-on-technicality

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Barnbrook’s work that was ignored by the mainstream media:

“Enemies of the People” now Available in Hard-copy: Citizens’ Handbook

Citizens’ Handbook
This work is an A5 60-page booklet that charts the criminals and rogues in British politics. In the booklet you will find irrefutable evidence of criminal and roguish M.P.s, councillors and other political party affiliates that is supported by website addresses linking to a national newspaper or media source that carried the story. There are a staggering 341 separate entries charting the criminals and rogues in New Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, UKIP -and yes, even the Scottish National Party.
This booklet is an absolute must for all those citizens who demand the truth before deciding on whom, or for what party, to vote.
For more information, an introduction to the booklet, and details on how to order your copy, please click on the link below:

Citizens’ Handbook

This work is an A5 60-page booklet that charts the criminals and rogues in British politics. In the booklet you will find irrefutable evidence of criminal and roguish M.P.s, councillors and other political party affiliates that is supported by website addresses linking to a national newspaper or media source that carried the story. There are a staggering 341 separate entries charting the criminals and rogues in New Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, UKIP -and yes, even the Scottish National Party.

This booklet is an absolute must for all those citizens who demand the truth before deciding on whom, or for what party, to vote.

For more information, an introduction to the booklet, and details on how to order your copy, please click on the link below:

Lasting Thought Press

Download the Leaflet Advertising the Citizens’ Handbook

A Short Statement by Admin Regarding the Expenses Scandal 2009

most galling aspect of the latest revelations regarding M.P.s’ expenses must surely be the thoughtless and flippant manner in which they have conducted themselves.
A case in point here is Douglass Hogg, the rich parasite who has attached himself to, and is feeding off, the back of the virtuous worker.
Not content with the luxury provided by his status as the head of a family mansion, Mr. Hogg –like a hog at a trough of “free money” stolen from the worker and his family by the taxman– has sought to bleed even more from the hard-up family man by charging the innocent worker the cost of maintaining his Lincolnshire mansion and clearing its moat.
During this sickening revelation of M.P.’s expenses (a situation those “in-the-know” have for some time known of) we the People have seen some truly egregious episodes of M.P.s stealing OUR MONEY. All of them, not sincerely apologetic, are sorry only for being found out.
Take, for instance, Mr. Hogg: his response to his almost feudal exploitation of serfdom was, in his cavalier attitude, “It is true the system is clearly flawed.”[1] This sentiment was also echoed by Harry Cohen who, upon himself being found out, did not apologise or try to make recompense, instead declaring: “When MP’s were given this allowance they were told, ‘Go and spend it boys’ and this is what I have done. It is my right.”[2]
So, people, what are we to do about these outrages? What are we to do in order to defend ourselves, our hard-earned taxes, and our honour? Well, good sense would dictate that the first, most sensible reaction is, of course, not to lick the boots that kick you. Do not vote for these parties or any of their charlatans who come knocking at your door in various friendly guises. Second thing to do would be to vote for an outsider party, one not aligned to the political mainstream gravy train, and thus deliver the blow to our enemies at the ballot box.
However, while adhering to the “democratic” system might appear to be the most sensible logical reaction, we must consider other options (one is never to put all his eggs in one basket). So, good people, is there a need for a Plan B? At the moment it might seem not. But we implore you to consider what really is (apart from corrupt) the “democratic” system under which we live.
Democracy is, in its truest from, rule by majority. You might consider yourselves well-served by, and best suited to, this system. Sure, in theory it does sound rather good, doesn’t it? Well, before we start to celebrate this system we would do well to consider what today’s “democracy” is really all about.
“Democracy” is, to give it its full title, Capitalist liberal democracy. This label is fact, not opinion. The notion of rule by majority has been replaced by the caveat of “liberal” –meaning that if the majority want it their own way then the idea and supposed virtue of liberalism can be used to defeat the majority’s wishes. Take, for instance, the very real and well-acknowledged fact that the British people do not desire to live under alien, foreign rule. A fair request, you may say. But consider then why this wish by the majority does not happen. It does not happen because those in control –the corrupt self-fulfilling enemies of the people– do not want us to live in happiness; they want instead for us to live in agony, solitude, desperation, fear, and under orders over which we have no influence.
Disbelieve us? Then please take a look Britain today and ask yourself: “is foolishness and inefficiency to blame for the appalling state of my country, or is it adept vicious rigor, subversive practice, and organised social control by our supposed “leaders” to blame?
To conclude, we might do well to look at the Capitalistic aspect of the tyranny we live under. Isn’t it extremely interesting how we as Britons are, as a nation, apparently broke and in recession –yet we can manage to bail out banks to the tune of BILLIONS of pounds? Could this bail out be due to the contract signed by mainstream political parties and politicians with the banks in order for the banks to fund them? Is our “government” so deeply involved in these corrupt contacts that they cannot free themselves from them? Why is it apparently more than acceptable for a war widow pensioner to starve and freeze to death –but a 30-something banker, having made the most unforgivable crime of greed in gambling taxpayers’ money, is rewarded for his “efforts”.
Until we are a minority we would do well to exercise our vote in order to try and banish our enemies from power. Once we are a minority then Plan B must, and will, come into action.
[1]  http://tinyurl.com/r8dn27 (paragraph 7)
[2]   http://tinyurl.com/qt8dpb (paragraph 7)
The most galling aspect of the latest revelations regarding M.P.s’ expenses must surely be the thoughtless and flippant manner in which they have conducted themselves.
A case in point here is Douglass Hogg, the rich parasite who has attached himself to, and is feeding off, the back of the virtuous worker.
Not content with the luxury provided by his status as the head of a family mansion, Mr. Hogg –like a hog at a trough of “free money” stolen from the worker and his family by the taxman– has sought to bleed even more from the hard-up family man by charging the innocent worker the cost of maintaining his Lincolnshire mansion and clearing its moat.
During this sickening revelation of M.P.’s expenses (a situation those “in-the-know” have for some time known of) we the People have seen some truly egregious episodes of M.P.s stealing OUR MONEY. All of them, not sincerely apologetic, are sorry only for being found out.
Take, for instance, Mr. Hogg: his response to his almost feudal exploitation of serfdom was, in his cavalier attitude, “It is true the system is clearly flawed.”[1] This sentiment was also echoed by Harry Cohen who, upon himself being found out, did not apologise or try to make recompense, instead declaring: “When MP’s were given this allowance they were told, ‘Go and spend it boys’ and this is what I have done. It is my right.”[2]
So, people, what are we to do about these outrages? What are we to do in order to defend ourselves, our hard-earned taxes, and our honour? Well, good sense would dictate that the first, most sensible reaction is, of course, not to lick the boots that kick you. Do not vote for these parties or any of their charlatans who come knocking at your door in various friendly guises. Second thing to do would be to vote for an outsider party, one not aligned to the political mainstream gravy train, and thus deliver the blow to our enemies at the ballot box.
However, while adhering to the “democratic” system might appear to be the most sensible logical reaction, we must consider other options (one is never to put all his eggs in one basket). So, good people, is there a need for a Plan B? At the moment it might seem not. But we implore you to consider what really is (apart from corrupt) the “democratic” system under which we live.
Democracy is, in its truest from, rule by majority. You might consider yourselves well-served by, and best suited to, this system. Sure, in theory it does sound rather good, doesn’t it? Well, before we start to celebrate this system we would do well to consider what today’s “democracy” is really all about.
“Democracy” is, to give it its full title, Capitalist liberal democracy. This label is fact, not opinion. The notion of rule by majority has been replaced by the caveat of “liberal” –meaning that if the majority want it their own way then the idea and supposed virtue of liberalism can be used to defeat the majority’s wishes. Take, for instance, the very real and well-acknowledged fact that the British people do not desire to live under alien, foreign rule. A fair request, you may say. But consider then why this wish by the majority does not happen. It does not happen because those in control –the corrupt self-fulfilling enemies of the people– do not want us to live in happiness; they want instead for us to live in agony, solitude, desperation, fear, and under orders over which we have no influence.
Disbelieve us? Then please take a look Britain today and ask yourself: “is foolishness and inefficiency to blame for the appalling state of my country, or is it adept vicious rigor, subversive practice, and organised social control by our supposed “leaders” to blame?
To conclude, we might do well to look at the Capitalistic aspect of the tyranny we live under. Isn’t it extremely interesting how we as Britons are, as a nation, apparently broke and in recession –yet we can manage to bail out banks to the tune of BILLIONS of pounds? Could this bail out be due to the contract signed by mainstream political parties and politicians with the banks in order for the banks to fund them? Is our “government” so deeply involved in these corrupt contacts that they cannot free themselves from them? Why is it apparently more than acceptable for a war widow pensioner to starve and freeze to death –but a 30-something banker, having made the most unforgivable crime of greed in gambling taxpayers’ money, is rewarded for his “efforts”.
Until we are a minority we would do well to exercise our vote in order to try and banish our enemies from power. Once we are a minority then Plan B must, and will, come into action.
[1]  http://tinyurl.com/r8dn27 (paragraph 7)
[2]   http://tinyurl.com/qt8dpb (paragraph 7)The most galling aspect of the latest revelations regarding M.P.s’ expenses must surely be the thoughtless and flippant manner in which they have conducted themselves.
A case in point here is Douglass Hogg, the rich parasite who has attached himself to, and is feeding off, the back of the virtuous worker.
Not content with the luxury provided by his status as the head of a family mansion, Mr. Hogg –like a hog at a trough of “free money” stolen from the worker and his family by the taxman– has sought to bleed even more from the hard-up family man by charging the innocent worker the cost of maintaining his Lincolnshire mansion and clearing its moat.
During this sickening revelation of M.P.’s expenses (a situation those “in-the-know” have for some time known of) we the People have seen some truly egregious episodes of M.P.s stealing OUR MONEY. All of them, not sincerely apologetic, are sorry only for being found out.
Take, for instance, Mr. Hogg: his response to his almost feudal exploitation of serfdom was, in his cavalier attitude, “It is true the system is clearly flawed.”[1] This sentiment was also echoed by Harry Cohen who, upon himself being found out, did not apologise or try to make recompense, instead declaring: “When MP’s were given this allowance they were told, ‘Go and spend it boys’ and this is what I have done. It is my right.”[2]
So, people, what are we to do about these outrages? What are we to do in order to defend ourselves, our hard-earned taxes, and our honour? Well, good sense would dictate that the first, most sensible reaction is, of course, not to lick the boots that kick you. Do not vote for these parties or any of their charlatans who come knocking at your door in various friendly guises. Second thing to do would be to vote for an outsider party, one not aligned to the political mainstream gravy train, and thus deliver the blow to our enemies at the ballot box.
However, while adhering to the “democratic” system might appear to be the most sensible logical reaction, we must consider other options (one is never to put all his eggs in one basket). So, good people, is there a need for a Plan B? At the moment it might seem not. But we implore you to consider what really is (apart from corrupt) the “democratic” system under which we live.
Democracy is, in its truest from, rule by majority. You might consider yourselves well-served by, and best suited to, this system. Sure, in theory it does sound rather good, doesn’t it? Well, before we start to celebrate this system we would do well to consider what today’s “democracy” is really all about.
“Democracy” is, to give it its full title, Capitalist liberal democracy. This label is fact, not opinion. The notion of rule by majority has been replaced by the caveat of “liberal” –meaning that if the majority want it their own way then the idea and supposed virtue of liberalism can be used to defeat the majority’s wishes. Take, for instance, the very real and well-acknowledged fact that the British people do not desire to live under alien, foreign rule. A fair request, you may say. But consider then why this wish by the majority does not happen. It does not happen because those in control –the corrupt self-fulfilling enemies of the people– do not want us to live in happiness; they want instead for us to live in agony, solitude, desperation, fear, and under orders over which we have no influence.
Disbelieve us? Then please take a look Britain today and ask yourself: “is foolishness and inefficiency to blame for the appalling state of my country, or is it adept vicious rigor, subversive practice, and organised social control by our supposed “leaders” to blame?
To conclude, we might do well to look at the Capitalistic aspect of the tyranny we live under. Isn’t it extremely interesting how we as Britons are, as a nation, apparently broke and in recession –yet we can manage to bail out banks to the tune of BILLIONS of pounds? Could this bail out be due to the contract signed by mainstream political parties and politicians with the banks in order for the banks to fund them? Is our “government” so deeply involved in these corrupt contacts that they cannot free themselves from them? Why is it apparently more than acceptable for a war widow pensioner to starve and freeze to death –but a 30-something banker, having made the most unforgivable crime of greed in gambling taxpayers’ money, is rewarded for his “efforts”.
Until we are a minority we would do well to exercise our vote in order to try and banish our enemies from power. Once we are a minority then Plan B must, and will, come into action.
[1]  http://tinyurl.com/r8dn27 (paragraph 7)
[2]   http://tinyurl.com/qt8dpb (paragraph 7)The most galling aspect of the latest revelations regarding M.P.s’ expenses must surely be the thoughtless and flippant manner in which they have conducted themselves.
A case in point here is Douglass Hogg, the rich parasite who has attached himself to, and is feeding off, the back of the virtuous worker.
Not content with the luxury provided by his status as the head of a family mansion, Mr. Hogg –like a hog at a trough of “free money” stolen from the worker and his family by the taxman– has sought to bleed even more from the hard-up family man by charging the innocent worker the cost of maintaining his Lincolnshire mansion and clearing its moat.
During this sickening revelation of M.P.’s expenses (a situation those “in-the-know” have for some time known of) we the People have seen some truly egregious episodes of M.P.s stealing OUR MONEY. All of them, not sincerely apologetic, are sorry only for being found out.
Take, for instance, Mr. Hogg: his response to his almost feudal exploitation of serfdom was, in his cavalier attitude, “It is true the system is clearly flawed.”[1] This sentiment was also echoed by Harry Cohen who, upon himself being found out, did not apologise or try to make recompense, instead declaring: “When MP’s were given this allowance they were told, ‘Go and spend it boys’ and this is what I have done. It is my right.”[2]
So, people, what are we to do about these outrages? What are we to do in order to defend ourselves, our hard-earned taxes, and our honour? Well, good sense would dictate that the first, most sensible reaction is, of course, not to lick the boots that kick you. Do not vote for these parties or any of their charlatans who come knocking at your door in various friendly guises. Second thing to do would be to vote for an outsider party, one not aligned to the political mainstream gravy train, and thus deliver the blow to our enemies at the ballot box.
However, while adhering to the “democratic” system might appear to be the most sensible logical reaction, we must consider other options (one is never to put all his eggs in one basket). So, good people, is there a need for a Plan B? At the moment it might seem not. But we implore you to consider what really is (apart from corrupt) the “democratic” system under which we live.
Democracy is, in its truest from, rule by majority. You might consider yourselves well-served by, and best suited to, this system. Sure, in theory it does sound rather good, doesn’t it? Well, before we start to celebrate this system we would do well to consider what today’s “democracy” is really all about.
“Democracy” is, to give it its full title, Capitalist liberal democracy. This label is fact, not opinion. The notion of rule by majority has been replaced by the caveat of “liberal” –meaning that if the majority want it their own way then the idea and supposed virtue of liberalism can be used to defeat the majority’s wishes. Take, for instance, the very real and well-acknowledged fact that the British people do not desire to live under alien, foreign rule. A fair request, you may say. But consider then why this wish by the majority does not happen. It does not happen because those in control –the corrupt self-fulfilling enemies of the people– do not want us to live in happiness; they want instead for us to live in agony, solitude, desperation, fear, and under orders over which we have no influence.
Disbelieve us? Then please take a look Britain today and ask yourself: “is foolishness and inefficiency to blame for the appalling state of my country, or is it adept vicious rigor, subversive practice, and organised social control by our supposed “leaders” to blame?
To conclude, we might do well to look at the Capitalistic aspect of the tyranny we live under. Isn’t it extremely interesting how we as Britons are, as a nation, apparently broke and in recession –yet we can manage to bail out banks to the tune of BILLIONS of pounds? Could this bail out be due to the contract signed by mainstream political parties and politicians with the banks in order for the banks to fund them? Is our “government” so deeply involved in these corrupt contacts that they cannot free themselves from them? Why is it apparently more than acceptable for a war widow pensioner to starve and freeze to death –but a 30-something banker, having made the most unforgivable crime of greed in gambling taxpayers’ money, is rewarded for his “efforts”.
Until we are a minority we would do well to exercise our vote in order to try and banish our enemies from power. Once we are a minority then Plan B must, and will, come into action.
[1]  http://tinyurl.com/r8dn27 (paragraph 7)
[2]   http://tinyurl.com/qt8dpb (paragraph 7)

The most galling aspect of the latest revelations regarding M.P.s’ expenses must surely be the thoughtless and flippant manner in which they have conducted themselves.

A case in point here is Douglass Hogg, the rich parasite who has attached himself to, and is feeding off, the back of the virtuous worker.

Not content with the luxury provided by his status as the head of a family mansion, Mr. Hogg –like a hog at a trough of “free money” stolen from the worker and his family by the taxman– has sought to bleed even more from the hard-up family man by charging the innocent worker the cost of maintaining his Lincolnshire mansion and clearing its moat.

During this sickening revelation of M.P.’s expenses (a situation those “in-the-know” have for some time known of) we the People have seen some truly egregious episodes of M.P.s stealing OUR MONEY. All of them, not sincerely apologetic, are sorry only for being found out.

Take, for instance, Mr. Hogg: his response to his almost feudal exploitation of serfdom was, in his cavalier attitude, “It is true the system is clearly flawed.”[1] This sentiment was also echoed by Harry Cohen who, upon himself being found out, did not apologise or try to make recompense, instead declaring: “When MP’s were given this allowance they were told, ‘Go and spend it boys’ and this is what I have done. It is my right.”[2]

So, people, what are we to do about these outrages? What are we to do in order to defend ourselves, our hard-earned taxes, and our honour? Well, good sense would dictate that the first, most sensible reaction is, of course, not to lick the boots that kick you. Do not vote for these parties or any of their charlatans who come knocking at your door in various friendly guises. Second thing to do would be to vote for an outsider party, one not aligned to the political mainstream gravy train, and thus deliver the blow to our enemies at the ballot box.

However, while adhering to the “democratic” system might appear to be the most sensible logical reaction, we must consider other options (one is never to put all his eggs in one basket). So, good people, is there a need for a Plan B? At the moment it might seem not. But we implore you to consider what really is (apart from corrupt) the “democratic” system under which we live.

Democracy is, in its truest from, rule by majority. You might consider yourselves well-served by, and best suited to, this system. Sure, in theory it does sound rather good, doesn’t it? Well, before we start to celebrate this system we would do well to consider what today’s “democracy” is really all about.

“Democracy” is, to give it its full title, Capitalist liberal democracy. This label is fact, not opinion. The notion of rule by majority has been replaced by the caveat of “liberal” –meaning that if the majority want it their own way then the idea and supposed virtue of liberalism can be used to defeat the majority’s wishes. Take, for instance, the very real and well-acknowledged fact that the British people do not desire to live under alien, foreign rule. A fair request, you may say. But consider then why this wish by the majority does not happen. It does not happen because those in control –the corrupt self-fulfilling enemies of the people– do not want us to live in happiness; they want instead for us to live in agony, solitude, desperation, fear, and under orders over which we have no influence.

Disbelieve us? Then please take a look Britain today and ask yourself: “is foolishness and inefficiency to blame for the appalling state of my country, or is it adept vicious rigor, subversive practice, and organised social control by our supposed “leaders” to blame?

To conclude, we might do well to look at the Capitalistic aspect of the tyranny we live under. Isn’t it extremely interesting how we as Britons are, as a nation, apparently broke and in recession –yet we can manage to bail out banks to the tune of BILLIONS of pounds? Could this bail out be due to the contract signed by mainstream political parties and politicians with the banks in order for the banks to fund them? Is our “government” so deeply involved in these corrupt contacts that they cannot free themselves from them? Why is it apparently more than acceptable for a war widow pensioner to starve and freeze to death –but a 30-something banker, having made the most unforgivable crime of greed in gambling taxpayers’ money, is rewarded for his “efforts”.

Until we are a minority we would do well to exercise our vote in order to try and banish our enemies from power. Once we are a minority then Plan B must, and will, come into action.

[1] http://tinyurl.com/r8dn27 (paragraph 7)

[2]   http://tinyurl.com/qt8dpb (paragraph 7)

The Leech Table as it Stands on 15/12/08

Well, it seems New Labour is in a commanding position at the top of the table. Can the flagging but promising Conservatives claw back some ground in terms of crimes against the electorate? Not forgetting the dark-horse outsider: might the Lib-Democrats show a bit of resolve and climb further up the table with one or two more sexual crimes under their belt? Well, all is to play for in this game that is anything but enjoyable -not for the people, at least. Watch out for more barnstorming misconduct from our Enemies as they play the corrupt game of “democracy” in constituencies up and down the country -never seeking to beat each other, seeking only instead to beat down further the electorate that votes for them.


Decadent Elite -1                       Innocent Citizens -0